Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Book 3: The First Man in Rome

Originally posted by audrey_e at Book 3: The First Man in Rome
3 THE FIRST MAN IN ROME Colleen McCullough (Australia, 1990)

This is the first volume in the historical fiction series The Masters of Rome. It focuses on Gaius Marius and Lucius Cornelius Sulla, their ambitions and successes. 

This novel is over 900 pages long and I cannot describe the relief I feel now that I'm done with it. Not because I do not like long books, but because it's one of the most boring books I've read in the last few years.
I'd read two novels by McCullough prior to this one. The Thorn Birds was cheesy but epic, and Morgan's Run was overlong and boring, though well-researched. I should have learnt my lesson.
The First Man in Rome is very well researched as well, and it's what drew me to the book in the first place. McCullough is regularly praised for the extent of her knowledge in Roman history. Does it make this book worth reading? Absolutely not.
The First Man is poorly written. At times it was so repetitive, both stylistically and in terms of content, that it would make me cringe. The most promising scenes and plot-twists were told retrospectively, thus robbing them of their energy. The most striking example is when Sulla spends a year with an enemy German tribe. Instead of allowing the reader to "live" these incredible experiences with him, the author tells us the story through a stiff dialogue and some after-thoughts. 
Let's talk a bit more about Sulla. According to a lot of reviewers Sulla, his ambitions, charm and homosexuality are the star of the book. Unfortunately there is no depth to them. All the complexities are laid out from the beginning and never truly develop as the story unfolds.

Next time I'll take the Roman History textbook, thank you.



( 8 pithy comments — Say something pithy! )
Jan. 30th, 2013 04:21 am (UTC)
I've read this one 20 years ago (oh horror!) and really fell from the series, which I have totally enjoyed. In the beginning it was hard to keep track of all the personalities, but then they grow on you somehow. And yes, I totally loved her Sulla and later Caesar and Octavian as well.

Not, that I am arguing - to each his own :) Just a dissenting opinion.
(Deleted comment)
Jan. 30th, 2013 08:22 pm (UTC)
I watched Rome after the books and I was so happy to see the 'familiar faces' even though some of them were rather different from McCullough's interpretation. I think, Marc Anthony was my favorite. And I am forever surprised, that there does not seem to be a film about Sulla.
Jan. 30th, 2013 06:26 pm (UTC)
I don't mind your arguing at all. That's what this community is for.
(Deleted comment)
Jan. 30th, 2013 06:36 pm (UTC)
I also watched the TV show Rome and liked it a lot.

While Ancient Rome is not exactly one of my favorite historical periods (my favorite historical periods almost always mirror my favorite literary periods---I was still an English major a couple of months ago), Colleen McCullough is the one I blame for this negative experience rather than the subject.

Having said that, it's true that I don't read very many historical fictions, not because I'm not interested in their subjects (quite the opposite) but because I'm afraid to get my facts wrong. I'm also afraid of the Philippa Gregory effect and their cheesiness and cheap writing style in general.
I have Wolf Hall on my list though. We'll see about that one.
(Deleted comment)
Jan. 31st, 2013 11:55 pm (UTC)
I hope so too!
( 8 pithy comments — Say something pithy! )



Latest Month

February 2017


Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow